fenics team mailing list archive

[Johan Hake <johan.hake@xxxxxxxxx>]

Not a big deal for me. 

But personally I get somewhat confused with year, month versioning numbers, a 
la Ubuntu and such. But then that is probably just me :P

Johan

On Monday August 15 2011 07:15:47 Anders Logg wrote:
> We've started on this discussion before but have never come to a
> conclusion.
> 
> What version numbers should we use for FEniCS itself and the
> individual packages?
> 
> Before, we have let all packages have their own version numbers, and
> then released FEniCS yy--mm (like 2011-06, 2011-12 etc) containing a
> collection of the other packages with some specific (but unrelated)
> version numbers.
> 
> Another option is to use the same version numbers for all packages,
> including FEniCS itself.
> 
> The question comes up now and needs to be resolved since Johannes is
> about to create a release of the meta-package fenics, either 1.0-beta
> or 2011-08.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> --
> Anders
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics
> Post to     : fenics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp