fenics team mailing list archive

[Kent-Andre Mardal <kent-and@xxxxxxxxx>]

Different packages evolve in different ways, some are very stable, while
others are not. It seems unnecessary to make all have the same numbering.

On 15 August 2011 16:15, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We've started on this discussion before but have never come to a
> conclusion.
>
> What version numbers should we use for FEniCS itself and the
> individual packages?
>
> Before, we have let all packages have their own version numbers, and
> then released FEniCS yy--mm (like 2011-06, 2011-12 etc) containing a
> collection of the other packages with some specific (but unrelated)
> version numbers.
>
> Another option is to use the same version numbers for all packages,
> including FEniCS itself.
>
> The question comes up now and needs to be resolved since Johannes is
> about to create a release of the meta-package fenics, either 1.0-beta
> or 2011-08.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Anders
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics
> Post to     : fenics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>