fenics team mailing list archive
-
fenics team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01894
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:13:17PM +0100, Johan Hake wrote:
> On 02/27/2013 09:54 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, 26 February 2013, Anders Logg wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:57:12AM +0100, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> > > On 26 February 2013 10:07, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 26 February 2013 01:16, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:13:44AM +0100, Martin Sandve Alnæs
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> - I think the two-way split (keeping dolfin separate, joining
> > at least
> > > > >> ufc-ffc-ufl) sounds most compelling and carries less risk.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Even more granular would be ufc-ffc. That way, FFC would contain all
> > > > the code formatting.
> > > >
> > > > > I'm still tempted by having one big repo.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm inclined to stay close to the status quo. If a big repo is
> > > > contemplated, someone should make one and we can test if it's
> > workable
> > > > with bzr. It may just be too big and bzr too slow.
> > >
> > >
> > > The best way to do such things is usually gradually. The first
> > steps could
> > > be:
> > > 1) Move ufc into the ffc repo.
> > > 2) Move dolfin wrapper generation back from dolfin to ffc?
> > > In these cases there are no big history and patching issues,
> > > so this can be done soon with no issues whatsoever (but
> > > preferably after we merge the work in progress by Anders and I).
> >
> > Sounds like a good start. Any objections to this?
> >
> >
> > No.
> >
> >
> >
> > Does this need we need to use CMake for FFC?
> >
> >
> > I do like the simplicity of the Python install for FFC over CMake.
>
> If we are going to keep each project in different sub directories we can
> keep distutils for ffc.
>
> ffc/
> ffc/
> setup.py
> ...
> ufc/
> CMakeList.txt
> ...
Sounds like a simple solution, but we also need a top level
installation method. Should that be CMake or distutils?
--
Anders
Follow ups
References
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Garth N. Wells, 2013-02-21
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Myles English, 2013-02-21
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Anders Logg, 2013-02-21
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2013-02-25
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Anders Logg, 2013-02-26
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Garth N. Wells, 2013-02-26
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2013-02-26
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Anders Logg, 2013-02-26
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Garth N. Wells, 2013-02-27
-
Re: UFR - The Unified Fenics Repository
From: Johan Hake, 2013-02-27