fenics team mailing list archive

["Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 6 March 2013 06:56, Johan Hake <hake.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I suggest we make 1.0.2, and 1.1.1 releases too, but I guess that was
> already on your mind?
>

I think we should rationalise this. We want (a) to minimise the amount
of work and (b) encourage users to update . I wouldn't bother with
1.1.1.

Garth

> Johan
>
> On 03/05/2013 05:10 PM, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It was suggested earlier today that we make a new release. No one has
>> objected and I have been appointed as the release manager, so we are
>> then at step four in the development model [1].
>>
>> Tomorrow, March 6, I will fork the development branches into 1.2.x
>> branches [2] to prepare for the release of FEniCS 1.2. The buildbot
>> will then be updated to build the 1.2.x branches, and when it is
>> green, we can go ahead and make the release. Alternatively, we can
>> wait one week as suggested by the development model. Development can
>> of course continue in the development branches, but only bug fixes
>> will be merged into the 1.2.x branches to be included in the 1.2
>> release.
>>
>> [1] http://fenicsproject.org/contributing/development_model.html
>> [2] DOLFIN, FFC, Instant, UFC (2.2.x) and UFL are needed
>>
>> Johannes
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics
>> Post to     : fenics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics
> Post to     : fenics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp