freeipa team mailing list archive

1. freeipa team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the freeipa mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• Re: State of SSSD packaging in Ubuntu, (continued)
  • Re: State of SSSD packaging in Ubuntu
    From: Mathias Gug, 2009-07-27
  • Re: State of SSSD packaging in Ubuntu
    From: Stephen Gallagher, 2009-07-28
• [Blueprint karmic-fedora-directory-server-inclusion] 389 Directory Server Inclusion in Karmic
  From: Miguel Pérez Colino, 2009-07-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Blueprint karmic-fedora-directory-server-inclusion] 389 Directory Server Inclusion in Karmic
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2012-10-24
• Fwd: Please review and advocate 389-directory-server (a successor of LDAP) related packages in REVU so that 389 can make it into Karmic
  From: Miguel Pérez Colino, 2009-07-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Please review and advocate 389-directory-server (a successor of LDAP) related packages in REVU so that 389 can make it into Karmic
  From: Kai-Cheung Leung, 2009-07-22
• Re: Please review and advocate 389-directory-server (a successor of LDAP) related packages in REVU so that 389 can make it into Karmic
  From: Mathias Gug, 2009-07-22
• Re: Please review and advocate 389-directory-server (a successor of LDAP) related packages in REVU so that 389 can make it into Karmic
  From: Stephen Gallagher, 2009-07-22
• Re: Please review and advocate 389-directory-server (a successor of LDAP) related packages in REVU so that 389 can make it into Karmic
  From: Mathias Gug, 2009-07-22
• Re: Please review and advocate 389-directory-server (a successor of LDAP) related packages in REVU so that 389 can make it into Karmic
  From: Stephen Gallagher, 2009-07-22
• Re: Please review and advocate 389-directory-server (a successor of LDAP) related packages in REVU so that 389 can make it into Karmic
  From: Benoit des Ligneris, 2009-07-24
• [Bug 372405] Re: ldb_module.h and associated files not included in package
  From: Mathias Gug, 2009-06-05
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 372405] Re: ldb_module.h and associated files not included in package
  From: Mathias Gug, 2009-06-08
• [Bug 372405] Re: ldb_module.h and associated files not included in package
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2009-06-09
• [Bug 372405] Re: ldb_module.h and associated files not included in package
  From: Mathias Gug, 2009-06-25
• [Bug 372405] Re: ldb_module.h and associated files not included in package
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2011-08-11
• [Bug 372399] Re: tevent packaging problems in samba4
  From: Mathias Gug, 2009-06-05
• [Bug 369744] Re: [needs-packaging] sssd
  From: Miguel Pérez Colino, 2009-05-11
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 369744] Re: [needs-packaging] sssd
  From: Miguel Pérez Colino, 2009-08-15
• [Bug 369744] Re: [needs-packaging] sssd
  From: Artur Rona, 2009-08-15
• [Bug 369744] Re: [needs-packaging] sssd
  From: Mathias Gug, 2009-08-17
• [Bug 369744] Re: [needs-packaging] sssd
  From: Ilya Barygin, 2010-01-04
• [Bug 369744] Re: [needs-packaging] sssd
  From: Brian Murray, 2010-01-05
• [Bug 369744] Re: [needs-packaging] sssd
  From: Wouter Stomp, 2010-01-13
• [Bug 369744] Re: [needs-packaging] sssd
  From: Artur Rona, 2010-01-13

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status