fuel-dev team mailing list archive
-
fuel-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01640
Re: External CI for external contributors
Hi Fuelers,
I think that our external contributors should definitely should have own
gateway. It should be a part of integration. Their gate can -1 but won't
affect on voting process though their team will be informed to take some
actions and fix their/our code respectively.
--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Evgeniya Shumakher <eshumakher@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Is there an approach that external contributors, like Mellanox, should use
> in order to build an external CI to demonstrate build/test results?
>
> There is a bug in launchpad created couple of months ago:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1320924, but i don't see any
> progress there.
>
> My proposal is to take a look at the process OpenStack community selected
> for building external CI systems and adapt it for MOS/Fuel.
> Jay Pypes wrote a series of blog posts with instructions for setting up
> external CI's:
>
> - http://www.joinfu.com/2014/01/understanding-the-openstack-ci-system/
> -
> http://www.joinfu.com/2014/02/setting-up-an-external-openstack-testing-system/comment-page-1/#comment-216389
> -
> http://www.joinfu.com/2014/02/setting-up-an-openstack-external-testing-system-part-2/
>
> Please let me know what you think about it.
> Mellanox team, your opinion is extremely important here.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Evgeniya
>
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
Follow ups
References