geda-developers team mailing list archive

[Peter TB Brett <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday 14 November 2012 09:42:54 you wrote:
> On 14 November 2012 09:14, Peter TB Brett <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Does that make sense?
> 
> Yup. I'll start on it tonight.
> 
> Do we have a criteria for what class/severity/scope of bug fix should
> be on stable-1.8 other than "don't change any translatable strings"?
> For example, would deprecated function replacement be significant
> enough to do in the stable branch, given that it's not (currently)
> functionally broken?
> 

Mmm.  Not sure.  I would be inclined to say that when a deprecated 
function can be replaced by an equivalent in a very straight forward and 
obvious way, then we should go ahead and do it in the stable branch. 
WDYT?

                            Peter

-- 
Peter Brett <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Remote Sensing Research Group
Surrey Space Centre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.