gtg-contributors team mailing list archive

[Luca Invernizzi <invernizzi.l@xxxxxxxxx>]

For this, we should choose a maintainer.
I'll try to read though the documentation in the next few days and list on
the bug (https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gtg/+bug/520171) the actions that
we should take.
Never surrender.

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Luca Invernizzi <invernizzi.l@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Sure!
>
> - We are famous enough
> - We have GNOME in the name of the project
> - tasque and tomboy is in there http://l10n.gnome.org/module/ which are
> very similar (ahem..) to us.
> - we may attract some developer
>
> What are the cons to this? I can list one:
> - bureaucracy to get in
>
> ps: I've already reported a similar bug
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gtg/+bug/520171
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Lionel Dricot <ploum@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2010/02/17/gnome-3-0-module-proposals-welcome-now/
>>
>> Do you think that GTG should be proposed as a GNOME 3 module ?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors
>> Post to     : gtg-contributors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>