gtg-contributors team mailing list archive

[Luca Invernizzi <invernizzi.l@xxxxxxxxx>]

After having read gnome guide to be added as a module, I can say that we
have all the cards to be accepted.
The cost of that would be:
- follow the six-month release cycle of GNOME, including freeze times
- start using gnome resources (Git and bugzilla).

I don't see any real advantages counterbalancing this. We would just get a
shiny badge and maybe some help.
Are there things I don't see?




On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Luca Invernizzi <invernizzi.l@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> For this, we should choose a maintainer.
> I'll try to read though the documentation in the next few days and list on
> the bug (https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gtg/+bug/520171) the actions that
> we should take.
> Never surrender.
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Luca Invernizzi <invernizzi.l@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Sure!
>>
>> - We are famous enough
>> - We have GNOME in the name of the project
>> - tasque and tomboy is in there http://l10n.gnome.org/module/ which are
>> very similar (ahem..) to us.
>> - we may attract some developer
>>
>> What are the cons to this? I can list one:
>> - bureaucracy to get in
>>
>> ps: I've already reported a similar bug
>> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gtg/+bug/520171
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Lionel Dricot <ploum@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2010/02/17/gnome-3-0-module-proposals-welcome-now/
>>>
>>> Do you think that GTG should be proposed as a GNOME 3 module ?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors
>>> Post to     : gtg-contributors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors
>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>
>>
>