gtg team mailing list archive
-
gtg team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00003
Should we really implement our task model ?
Our proposed task model is nearly implemented (but still not really
usable) in the following branch :
https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gtg/gtg/subtask_model
But my first test on this are not really a success.
Example :
Let's have the following tasks in the browser :
Main
->subtask 1
->subtask 2
-->subsubtask 2.1
When opening Main, we should see :
-> subtask 1
-> subtask 2.1
|-> subtask 2
(so you can see immediatly that you should concentrate on 1 and 2.1)
Problem 1 : I'm not sure it's really intuitive. It looks like it's buggy
because the representation of editor and tree look the same (even if
they are completely different)
Problem 2 : Let's say that Main is a subtask of MegaMain. What should
opening MegaMain looks like ?
->subtask 1
|-> Main
-> subtask 2.1
|-> subtask 2
|-> Main
???? Two times "Main" ? Not really pretty but why not...
Problem 3 : having such a representation makes it very very fragile when
the user edit it by hand. I realize that even if we can find a one-way
logic to describe a task structure, there's nearly no chance that a user
understand it.
If need advice on this. This stuff represent one full week of work but
we should remain realistic and maybe it was an error.
Lionel