kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Dick Hollenbeck <dick@...>]

> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag 18 März 2008 23:50:56 schrieb Dick Hollenbeck:
>
> > 1) Since we still don't have all classes with a GetBoundingBox(), there
> > was the old alternative call that you removed that I think still needs
> > to be there until such time as we have all implementations. 
>
> I see your point. I will try and get all implementations ready. It will be 1-2 
> weeks before I'll have time to look at this again though.

Doing all implementations will take more than a few minutes. However, 
to add back the 3 lines of code which test for the classes which already 
have the function can be done in 5 minutes. If you would like I can do 
this for you and add the patch? Then as you find time *you* can 
transition over class by class.

> > 2) Where you call the base class EDA_BaseStruct::GetBoundingBox() why
> > don't you instead just make your own empty rectangle, that way we won't
> > get the debug print statements. I am almost always using the debug builds.
>
> Sure.
>
> Best regards
> Jonas
>
> PS: I have added a patch to the tracker so we don't forget about this.

Sounds good.

Dick