kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01433
Re: Re: [eeschema] BUG: annotating multiple instance
Hi
Yes, I have parts spread over different shematics. I thought that this
is a bug because if you have parts spread in shematic with different
names annotation works correctly. Why the behaviour of the annotation is
not the same in both cases?? It is wrong that you have to know that
in some cases it will work and in some cases not!
Rok
yajeed2000 pravi:
>
>
> --- In kicad-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:kicad-devel%40yahoogroups.com>, "Tim Hanson" <tim@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I just checked this myself, and I do not see the bug. In one of my
>> schematics which is instanced multiple times I have a LM324 - 4 parts
>> /package - and the references were set correctly for this during
>> annotation. Could you attach example files(s) to better illustrate
>> the problem?
>>
>> Do note that with packages that contain multiple parts, the multiple
>> parts cannot be spread across different schematic files. That is, all
>> 4 opamps in the LM324 must be on the same schematic.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Rok Markovic <rok@...> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > In kicad build 962 there is an error with annotating items
>> > with multiple parts on sheets with the same source file.
>> >
>> > Howto generate bug:
>> > Create a multiple instance of the same sheet with one or more
>> > multipart component on it. Click annotate. If you look into child
>> > sheets, you can see that all components are anotated with the same
>> > part number but with same designator number.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Rok
>> >
>> > Kanardia d.o.o.
>> > ul. heroja Rojška 70
>> > 3000 Celje
>> > Tel: +386 3 424 42 42
>> > Fax: +386 3 424 41 95
>> >
>> >
>>
> Hi,
> I have a schematic produced using version SVN r876. I have a 4 gate
> logic chip (74hc132) that is spread across 3 schematic subsheets.Each
> subsheet is named as a seperate schematic file.
> This works OK.
> Is this capability broken in the latest version or do I misunderstand.
>
> David.
>
>
References