On 11/9/2010 4:11 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
On 11/09/2010 02:35 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
I just got DFM failure from my PCB manufacture for silk screen width of 0.001"
for all the silk screen drawings on a board I just laid out. I checked all of
the module silk screen widths and everything is 0.005" or larger. A quick
check of the silk screen layer gerber file revealed the aperture being used was
indeed 0.001". After some digging around, I found that changing the "Default
pen size" in the plot dialog changed the silk screen line width. Is this the
appropriate behavior? Setting the default line width to 0 did not fall back to
the line width defined in the module. I would expect my silk screen line
widths to be what I defined them in my module not the default pen size setting.
At one time, I thought this was the default behavior. Before I file a bug
report, I wanted to make sure I'm not missing something. Anyone else have any
thoughts on this?
Wayne
Its not perfectly pertinent to your question, but I have found
/scripts/setfont.sh
to be useful after I have a board ready to plot.
I have not stumbled onto your problem before. Maybe something has
changed, or I just missed it.
I haven't laid out a board with the latest stable version so I can't say for
sure but I don't remember having this problem with the previous stable version.
> From a UI perspective, I would not prefer to have to set the default
width to zero to say, "leave me alone".
I would prefer to select a checkbox saying override the line-widths, or NOT.
A check box would be preferable. Setting the line width to 0 is less than
obvious to the user. Currently, setting the line width to 0 will set the
aperture to 0 which in itself might be consider a bug. I confirmed this with
BZR 2595.
Wayne
Dick