kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06335
Re: Sweet parser
> Pin name is, in fact, actually a pin description, and currently is just a comment.
>
> About pin "numbers" (currently a 4 characters identifier) I believe an enhancement in Eeschema could be the support of pins having
> multiple pin numbers.
> I see 2 cases:
> -Power pins in large ICs:
> they have 100 or more GND, VCC .. pins.
> In schematic an enhancement could be: put only one pin having one pin name (or description) and a lot of pin numbers.
> -"Bus pins"
> The is in fact a similar case: one pin having many pin numbers.
> Useful for components like memories and microprocessors to handle data bus and address bus with only 2 pins.
> the difference between these pins is mainly for netlist generation.
>
> In library files format and load/save functions, just allow the ability to store more than one pin number per pin.
> The cost is low.
What we have now is:
(pinTYPE SHAPE (at X Y [ANGLE])
(length LENGTH)
(name“NAME” (font[FONT] (size HEIGHT WIDTH) [italic] [bold]) (visible YES))
(number“NUMBER” (font[FONT] (size HEIGHT WIDTH) [italic] [bold])
(visible YES))
(visible YES)
)
So a 3rd consideration is to do what Jean-Pierre suggested, handling
multiple (number....) elements.
Feedback on the 3 ideas is needed at this point. Without feedback I will not
change anything, since multiple pin 'number's can be added later relatively
easily.
Dick
Follow ups
References
-
Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-01-03
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-01-03
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2011-01-03
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-02-14
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-02-28
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-03-21
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: jean-pierre charras, 2011-03-21
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-03-21
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: jean-pierre charras, 2011-03-21