← Back to team overview

kicad-developers team mailing list archive

Re: [PATCH] Component and module search displays in which library they live

 

Hi Wayne,

Please let me know why it fails to apply. The last one with suffix 8 will
probably fail as well because the only new changes are coding style fixes.

On my side, I made sure everything is alright with the latest revision
doing the following:

bzr branch lp:kicad kicad_carl
cd kicad_carl
bzr merge cmp_and_mod_display_library_8.patch
mkdir build; cd build
cmake ../ -DKICAD_TESTING_VERSION=ON -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
make

And then I tested everything with one of my projects as well as a new one.
I believe I did not miss anything in regard to verifying the functionality
in the latest revision, but I'm new to bazaar (using hg and svn) so I guess
I may have forgot something.

That being said, I understand the priority should be put to the fp lib
changes.

Carl

On Sunday, March 17, 2013, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:

> On 3/17/2013 9:07 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>
>> On 3/17/2013 4:52 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>>
>>> Wayne,
>>>
>>> We need your approval, no or no go.
>>>
>>> We can also table it somewhere until the fp lib table smoke clears.
>>>
>>
>> I just tried to apply this patch and it failed against r4017.  The last
>> version I have of this patch had a suffix of 6.  I did take a look at it
>>
>
> I just checked the mailing list and saw that the patch is up to suffix 8.
>  I must have missed it.  I'll try to test it tomorrow.
>
>  and it I may hold off until the footprint table code is ready.  The
> reason being is it may add confusion to the library ordering issue.
> Users may think that they can now safely select a footprint or component
> with a duplicate without regard to library ordering which could cause
> more confusion than we already have on this issue.  The other problem
> will be that this dialog is used for both Eeschema and Pcbnew so we may
> to tweak it to handle both the current library path sort order and the
> footprint library table methods.  I suppose I could create a new dialog
> for selecting footprints using the footprint library table and keep the
> current dialog for selecting components in Eeschema until we get the new
> file format and SWEET implemented.  I would like to apply this patch and
> test it's behavior before I give it the OK.
>
>
> On Mar 17, 2013 12:09 PM, "Carl Poirier" <carl.poirier.2@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:carl.poirier.2@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     By the way, uncrustify was telling me about unknown symbols which I
>     believe may be some mistake on my side, so I just commented out the
>     lines in the aformentioned tool to get it to work. I forgot to
>     remove them before creating the patch though so just ignore this
>     change or look at this one instead!
>
>     Carl
>
>     On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Carl Poirier
>     <carl.poirier.2@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:carl.poirier.2@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>         I found a few other kinks in the coding style of the patch using
>         the checkcoding.py tool from Miguel and made sure it still
>         compiles fine using the latest revision.
>
>         Please let me know if everything is alright.
>
>         Carl
>
>
>         On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Carl Poirier
>         <carl.poirier.2@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:carl.poirier.2@xxxxxxxxx>>
> wrote:
>
>             Hi Dick,
>
>             I just wanted to have a follow-up on that patch. Is
>             everything alright?
>
>             Thanks,
>
>             Carl
>
>
>             On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Carl Poirier
>             <carl.poirier.2@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:carl.poirier.2@xxxxxxxxx>>
>             wrote:
>
>                 Hi Dick,
>
>                 Thanks for pointing that out. This one should hopefully
>                 do the trick.
>
>                 Carl
>
>
>                 On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Dick Hollenbeck
>                 <dick@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>                     On 03/07/2013 10:39 AM, Carl Poirier wrote:
>                      > +    for(unsigned i = 0; i < itemList.size(); i++)
>
>
>                     for( unsigned i = 0; i < itemList.size(); i++ )
>
>
>                     in 4 or more places.
>
>
>
>                     ______________________________**_________________
>                     Mailing list:
>                     https://launchpad.net/~kicad-**developers<https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>                     <https://launchpad.net/%**7Ekicad-developers<https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-developers>
> >
>                     Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>                     <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>                     Unsubscribe :
>                     https://launchpad.net/~kicad-**developers<https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>                     <https://launchpad.net/%**7Ekicad-developers<https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-developers>
> >
>                     More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/**ListHelp<https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-**developers<https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-**developers<https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/**ListHelp<https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Mailing

Follow ups

References