kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #28702
Re: [PATCH] Refactor LAYER_ID to be the one and only layer definition
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 07:05:59PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Hey Jon,
>
> This is better than the giant enum concept and I'm willing to accept
> this. It still lacks the type safety of the enum inheritance solution.
Bad memories with layers enums :D funny thing when I proposed the layer_id solution other people told me 'integers are easier to use'. Oh well
By the way, with 'enum inheritance' are you referring to class enums? Never used them but they seem a fine concept
--
Lorenzo Marcantonio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
References
-
[PATCH] Refactor LAYER_ID to be the one and only layer definition
From: Jon Evans, 2017-03-13
-
Re: [PATCH] Refactor LAYER_ID to be the one and only layer definition
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2017-03-13
-
Re: [PATCH] Refactor LAYER_ID to be the one and only layer definition
From: Jon Evans, 2017-03-13
-
Re: [PATCH] Refactor LAYER_ID to be the one and only layer definition
From: Maciej Suminski, 2017-03-13
-
Re: [PATCH] Refactor LAYER_ID to be the one and only layer definition
From: Jon Evans, 2017-03-13
-
Re: [PATCH] Refactor LAYER_ID to be the one and only layer definition
From: Jon Evans, 2017-03-14
-
Re: [PATCH] Refactor LAYER_ID to be the one and only layer definition
From: John Beard, 2017-03-14
-
Re: [PATCH] Refactor LAYER_ID to be the one and only layer definition
From: Jon Evans, 2017-03-14
-
Re: [PATCH] Refactor LAYER_ID to be the one and only layer definition
From: Jon Evans, 2017-03-14
-
Re: [PATCH] Refactor LAYER_ID to be the one and only layer definition
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2017-03-14