kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #32235
Re: Simulator towards 5.0
Hi,
On 06.12.2017 11:12, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
> I do not see why anyone is even objecting to this? Where is the logic at
> having a default build that does not correspond to any of the official
> packages?!
That usually happens because the nightly builds enable all the
experimental features to allow people to test them, but the default is
still "disabled" because they introduce extra dependencies and make life
difficult for people compiling from source.
The default for new options needs to be decided before the release, I
think, and "release" packages should go with that.
Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Follow ups
References
-
Simulator towards 5.0
From: Kristoffer Ödmark, 2017-12-04
-
Re: Simulator towards 5.0
From: Tomasz Wlostowski, 2017-12-04
-
Re: Simulator towards 5.0
From: kristoffer Ödmark, 2017-12-04
-
Re: Simulator towards 5.0
From: Nick Østergaard, 2017-12-04
-
Re: Simulator towards 5.0
From: Kristoffer Ödmark, 2017-12-05
-
Re: Simulator towards 5.0
From: Nick Østergaard, 2017-12-05
-
Re: Simulator towards 5.0
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2017-12-05
-
Re: Simulator towards 5.0
From: Nick Østergaard, 2017-12-05
-
Re: Simulator towards 5.0
From: Maciej Sumiński, 2017-12-05
-
Re: Simulator towards 5.0
From: Nick Østergaard, 2017-12-05
-
Re: Simulator towards 5.0
From: Maciej Sumiński, 2017-12-05
-
Re: Simulator towards 5.0
From: Simon Richter, 2017-12-05
-
Re: Simulator towards 5.0
From: Kristoffer Ödmark, 2017-12-06