Hi Rene,
On 05/18/2018 11:53 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
On 18/05/18 16:44, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
If any of our doc and library devs are on this mailing list, please
forward this information so we aren't making major changes to the docs
and libraries at the last minute.
We have one important pull request open that i will fix up my self
tomorrow if the contributor does not fix the remaining issues him self.
(Removing duplicate power pins from symbols as this can be quite
dangerous if the user connects them multiple times.)
After this is merged i will tag the library with "5.0.0-rc2" (Tomorrow
evening)
After this tag is set we will no longer allow renaming of libs until v6
development. (Adding new libs will still be allowed.)
I'm OK with this.
I will also create a kicad 4 compatibility backport for this lib. (The
intention is to allow users to use the new library structure for new
projects even if they can not update to a nightly build. This should
reduce their work when they then switch over to kicad 5)
This backport will contain a reduced number of footprints as footprints
with custom or roundrect pads are not supported by kicad 4. I will also
backport the symbol libs. The 3d lib does not need any work in this
regard but i will still ad a separate release tag to make it easier for
users. Not sure if i will make a backport of the templates.
Creating this backport will take some time but i hope to have it done
one week after the rc2 tag is set.
Awesome! I'm sure our v4 users will appreciate this.
Regarding the issue about footprint connection you reported in [1]:
All symbols that have a valid symbol in the footprint lib are now
correctly connected. Sadly a lot of symbols still need footprints to be
generated. (Symbols where in the lib that never had a valid footprint)
Some of this will be fixed after the rc2 release. This will not impact
the library structure so i assume we can include these changes in the
final v5 release. (It will simply add more footprints.)
That fine by me. If we are going add new symbol libraries during v5, I
don't see any reason not to add new footprints and footprint libraries.
We should try to avoid wholesale renaming and/or moving of libraries and
their contents to avoid headaches for users. If we have any major
library reorganizations, we can always create a v5 branch as we do for
the KiCad source.
Thank you for all of your hard work on the libraries. They really have
come a long way since v4 was released.
Cheers,
Wayne
[1]: https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/issues/520
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
