The person in the forum misunderstood your intention, he thought you
opposed the idea of atomic libraries. I interpreted you meaning that the
KiCad's own libraries won't be atomic. There's no need to engage, we
will send your positive message there, namely that all workflows will
always be fully supported. Right?
Eeli Kaikkonen
la 4. toukok. 2019 klo 0.14 Wayne Stambaugh (stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>) kirjoitti:
On 5/3/2019 4:59 PM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> On 03/05/19 22:48, Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
>> I was just trying to find this discussion in the video, can you give
>> the time?
>>
>> The link to the video is here, for the future generations of
internet
>> search engine users who find this thread:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRwTyBX2BFk
>>
>>
> Around 4 minutes in.
>
>
> And i think a single remark made towards the end of that answer
spawned
> this hellfire:
>
https://forum.kicad.info/t/more-fully-specified-symbol-library-discussion/16701
> (Fair warning the poster took a small remark way too seriously and
> assumed that the fully specified symbol workflow might go away.
Which i
> do not belive was the intended message at all. The reason i even made
> this post was that i knew that thread quite well and immediately
> realized where the user got the ideas from just by hearing that
answer.
> I just wanted to give you guys my interpretation of the 2 or 3
possible
> workflows as a possible reference and in part to ensure users
that all
> workflows are seen as equally viable depending on exact
circumstance.)
>
Feel free to engage this if you want to but please don't drag me into
it. Honestly, I really don't care how users define their symbols or
what work flow users prefer. KiCad places no restrictions on this
regard nor do I plan to change that. I don't understood what the big
deal is. Are they upset that we are not providing fully defined
symbols? That's not even a reasonable request since there is no way to
meet everyone's individual needs but that doesn't mean that they cannot
do this. I really don't know what else can be said about this issue
that hasn't been said over and over again.
Wayne
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
