kicad-lib-committers team mailing list archive

[Jean-Paul Louis <louijp@xxxxxxxxx>]

I would like to take the IC packages starting with SO.
I see that there are duplicate categories and confusion with SOT23 that are in two categories
32 and 34.

Jean-Paul
AC9GH @ EN61vr99
louijp at yahoo dot com


On May 30, 2014, at 6:09 AM, John Beard <john.j.beard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'd like to take Connectors_Serial_MOLEX.pretty for the moment, please.
> 
> Would it be possible to rename it to "Connectors_Molex.pretty"?
> PicoBlades aren't serial connectors specifically. Also, if we have
> libraries for each range of connectors (like Connectors_Molex_PicoBlade,
> Connectors_Harwin_M40, Connectors_Molex_KK and so on), we'll have
> hundreds of libraries. It would be nice to be able to do
> Connectors->Molex->PicoBlade, but I realise the current system doesn't
> work like that.
> 
> On 30/05/14 10:48, Paweł Dras wrote:
>> But i see a loot of inconsistency in footprints groups.
>> Perhaps we should reduce .pretty groups count and naming convention.
> 
> I agree, fragmented libraries make it hard to see what you have.
> 
>> The same situation is with the names Sockets_*,  Terminal_Blocks and
>> even with Pin arrays. I suggest to change in all prefix to Connectors_
> 
> I agree with this - I don't think connectors need to be separated by
> gender. When you get to some board-to-board connectors, it can be hard
> to say which is the socket and the plug anyway. And for wire-to-board,
> there's only one gender which makes sense for a PCB: the header.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers
> Post to     : kicad-lib-committers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp