larry-discuss team mailing list archive

1. larry-discuss team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the larry-discuss mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• larry mailing moved
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-07-03
• larry moving to github
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-06-18
• Outer joins on int dtype in pandas and la
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-06-13
• rand and randn
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-06-05
• [ANN] la 0.3, the labeled array
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-06-04
• Fwd: Cython function with python fallback
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-05-31
• Benchmark suite
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-05-31
• Release schedule for la 0.3
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-05-26
• General purpose binary operator
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-05-25
• Re: [pystatsmodels] General purpose binary operator
  From: Skipper Seabold, 2010-05-26
• Faster binary operations
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-05-24
• The labeled array package at a glance
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-05-23
• Bootstrap and cross validation iterators
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-05-23
• Re: Bootstrap and cross validation iterators
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-05-23
• Re: [pystatsmodels] Re: Bootstrap and cross validation iterators
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-05-23
• Re: [pystatsmodels] Re: Bootstrap and cross validation iterators
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-05-23
• Re: [pystatsmodels] Re: Bootstrap and cross validation iterators
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-05-25
• Re: [pystatsmodels] Re: Bootstrap and cross validation iterators
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-05-25
• Re: [pystatsmodels] Re: Bootstrap and cross validation iterators
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-05-25
• groupmean reduce
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-05-03
• Re: groupmean reduce
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-05-04
• Re: groupmean reduce
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-05-04
• Re: groupmean reduce
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-05-04
• Re: groupmean reduce
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-05-04
• [ANN] la 0.2, the labeled array
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-04-27
• Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Message not available
• Message not available
• Message not available
• Message not available
• Message not available
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-09
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-09
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-09
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-09
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-09
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-09
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-09
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-09
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-09
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-09
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-09
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-10
• Re: Index by label support added to experimental branch
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-09
• Label indexing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Label indexing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: Label indexing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Label indexing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: Label indexing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Label indexing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: Label indexing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Label indexing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: Label indexing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Label indexing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Label indexing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: Label indexing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: Label indexing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-07
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-07
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-07
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-07
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-08
• Re: A new proposal for indexing with labels
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-08
• Can all larry methods handle empty larrys?
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-06
• Re: Can all larry methods handle empty larrys?
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-06
• Re: Can all larry methods handle empty larrys?
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-06
• stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-05
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-11
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-11
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-11
• Re: stream lining signature of assert_larry_equal
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-11
• test coverage
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-04
• Re: test coverage
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-04
• Re: test coverage
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Missing values in larry
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Re: [Blueprint simplify-unit-testing] Create a larry specific assert function to simplify unit testing
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-04
• Plans for la 0.2
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-03
• Re: Plans for la 0.2
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-02-04
• Re: Plans for la 0.2
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-06
• Re: Plans for la 0.2
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-06
• [ANN] New package for manipulating labeled arrays
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-03
• Release plans for 0.1
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-01
• Re: Release plans for 0.1
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-01
• Re: Release plans for 0.1
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-02
• Re: Release plans for 0.1
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-02-02
• New features: totuples, fromtuples
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-01-31
• Re: New features: totuples, fromtuples
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-01-31
• <Possible follow-ups>
• New features: totuples, fromtuples
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-01-31
• Re: New features: totuples, fromtuples
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-01-31
• Message not available
• Message not available
• Re: New features: totuples, fromtuples
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-01-31
• Re: New features: totuples, fromtuples
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-01-31
• Re: New features: totuples, fromtuples
  From: josef . pktd, 2010-01-31
• Re: New features: totuples, fromtuples
  From: Keith Goodman, 2010-01-31

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2011 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  System status