Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
On Sep 16, 2009, at 9:25 AM, Danilo Šegan wrote:
У уто, 15. 09 2009. у 21:25 -0500, Deryck Hodge пише:Hi, all. Please see bug 429735[1] if you need the context that brings this question. Am I reading the heading/title rules correctly on the wiki[2] that reverse bread crumbs are preferred in our page titles? This seems odd to me, if so. I realize it's trivial to override, so the question is more about our preference for the site. Do we really want reverse breadcrumbs on almost every sub page?I'd say we do,
Agreed, and this was just discussed in the UI call. Martin will be following up with details, but the summary is that for consistency we really want to use the same automated calculation of the <title> text, and that for google-fu we want the reverse-breadcrumbs to be used.
What this likely means is that post-3.0 we'll remove the ability to override <title> (though we'll still need a way to specify a <title> for pages that have no breadcrumbs).
We acknowledge that the individual breadcrumb components for some page is less than optimal though, so the solution really will be to override your breadcrumb components to be more useful. You should already be able to do that.
-Barry
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |