launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #05284
Re: Experiment proposal: Optional Reviews
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Julian Edwards
<julian.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday 22 October 2010 04:02:41 Robert Collins wrote:
>> I do like the idea of catching problems early, but let's do that
>> explicitly: I will review *all* unreviewed landings (other than ones I
>> do) in the two weeks, and if I land anything unreviewied, someone else
>> - say jml - can review those.
>> - javascript reviews
>> - sure, let's leave them out of scope
>
> Can anyone remember why we abandoned [r=trivial] ?
>
> >From what I remember of it, we seemed to use it for more than just "trivial"
> branches; i.e. mechanical changes etc., and I reckon what we were doing back
> then is not too dissimilar to Rob's proposal.
>
Actually, I don't think this is what Rob is proposing. I think he is
saying qualified contributors can take reviews at their discretion.
Period.
Cheers,
deryck
--
Deryck Hodge
https://launchpad.net/~deryck
http://www.devurandom.org/
Follow ups
References