launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

["Francis J. Lacoste" <francis.lacoste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On November 2, 2010, Marc Tardif wrote:
> * Robert Collins <robert.collins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-11-03 03:48 +1300]:
> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Francis J. Lacoste
> > 
> > <francis.lacoste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > lp isn't a namespace package in Launchpad. I guess that's what Robert
> > > is hinting at by the "no good story". It was meant to be, but it seems
> > > that we added .py directly in it, at some point. And it misses the
> > > namespace registration declaration. I've filed bug 669938 about this.
> > > 
> > > In the mean time, we could use a lpx namespace for applications
> > > building on top of Launchpad?
> > 
> > I'd be fine with having a namespace package for lpx, fwiw. I think
> > that would be better in fact, than having external trees directly
> > injecting code into 'lp'.
> 
> I like it, my concern is mostly to be consistent with Launchpad moving
> forward. For example, since I have a fixation with the Librarian, would
> it make sense if I eventually extracted it as a standalone package to
> have it also reside under the lpx namespace?

I don't think the librarian is something that would be released under lpx. 
Since it's in a way a generic thing, lazr pour make more sense.

-- 
Francis J. Lacoste
francis.lacoste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.