launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #08672
Re: SOA object ids
-
To:
launchpad-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Aaron Bentley <aaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:27:50 -0500
-
In-reply-to:
<CAJ3HoZ1x9vMvEE_QEKatHBuf8CexgBpX8UkLc3=ukUpBq-3rnQ@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11-12-13 01:26 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
> We could say 'utf8' and leave it at that. Or we could say 'the
> printable subset of ascii' or some such. I'd just say non
> whitespace utf8, as strings are easier to deal with, and avoiding
> whitespace avoids most likely encoding issues.
If we're using Unicode identifiers, do we need to specify a
normalization form (NFC or NFD), or would we impose that on the data
after receiving it?
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk7nYOIACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI35RwCghOAMri5/6IBlXv1gjqDAelWI
9vsAn2Ka0zVUHLjB9MHWWvcwnnMNjBrJ
=KCY3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Follow ups
References