launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #08675
Re: SOA object ids
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Aaron Bentley <aaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11-12-13 01:26 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
>> We could say 'utf8' and leave it at that. Or we could say 'the
>> printable subset of ascii' or some such. I'd just say non
>> whitespace utf8, as strings are easier to deal with, and avoiding
>> whitespace avoids most likely encoding issues.
>
> If we're using Unicode identifiers, do we need to specify a
> normalization form (NFC or NFD), or would we impose that on the data
> after receiving it?
http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod-norm/ - NFC. Remember that they are
opaque, so no service ever has a reason to renormalise an identifier.
-Rob
References