← Back to team overview

launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

Re: The lp apocalypse is realised

 

On 01/09/2012 11:02 PM, Marc Tardif wrote:
> * Robert Collins <robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2012-01-02 15:29 +1300]:
>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 10:14 AM, curtis Hovey
>> <curtis.hovey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Ladies and gentlemen, hackers and users, rocket scientists.
>>>
>>> Messieurs Grant and Hovey are proud to announce that all the Launchpad
>>> code that interests you resides in lib/lp. lib/canonical is remains to
>>> support a few external needs.
>>
>> Congrats.
>>
>> I agree that canonical specific stuff, like our branding, should stay
>> in a canonical directory. I'd kind of like to get that entirely out of
>> tree, but that is an entirely different proposition :)
> 
> The Launchpad Results project happens to use some of the images from
> Launchpad to provide a similar looking interface until the project
> becomes a real microservice:
> 
>   http://results-tracker.ubuntu.com
> 
> Should these images be separated somehow, perhaps just by a "canonical"
> namespace to make it clear that they are part of branding? Or, might it
> not be worth the effort since they will eventually disappear anyway?

You do not need to move the images. There is nothing wrong with how the
image are being used since they are still hosted on a Canonical site.
States in it's license file that the images are under a separate license
(see https://dev.launchpad.net/LaunchpadLicense). If it is ambiguous
which images are proprietary, you can name them explicitly or move them
to a separate directory.


-- 
Curtis Hovey
http://launchpad.net/~sinzui

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Follow ups

References