launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #08939
Re: RFC: either remove 'Ubuntu CoC signing required' for PPA use, or enforce it consistently
-
To:
launchpad-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Julian Edwards <julian.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:49:07 +0000
-
In-reply-to:
<CAJ3HoZ0i445tRuakG=WdcWoS5wB2=tZ1ahBG-1jOW1yhJUuKwg@mail.gmail.com>
-
Organization:
Canonical Ltd
-
User-agent:
KMail/4.8.0 (Linux/3.2.0-15-generic; KDE/4.8.0; x86_64; ; )
On Sunday 12 February 2012 13:09:39 Robert Collins wrote:
> At the moment, we require the Ubuntu CoC to be signed to create and
> use a PPA as an individual. As a member of a team, there is no such
> requirement.
>
> (Note that private PPAs w/commercial entitlements are arguably
> different, so I'm not talking about them at all here).
>
> I believe jml has in the past said that the CoC requirement wasn't all
> that useful - it occurs to me that we can make LP PPA's easier to get
> going with if we drop it entirely; if we are not willing to do that,
> then I think we really have to fix the use-via-team hole, or we'll be
> tangling ourselves up in knots to justify keeping this
> partial-enforced rule.
>
> Any strong objections or concerns any which way?
Fixing the hole should be fairly trivial, so let's do it (remembering to not
enforce for private/commercial PPAs).
I would also look at the original reasons for having this requirement before
removing it.
Cheers
J
References