← Back to team overview

launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

Re: RFC: either remove 'Ubuntu CoC signing required' for PPA use, or enforce it consistently

 

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Matthew Revell
<matthew.revell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 14 February 2012 10:01, Jonathan Lange <jml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Matthew Revell
>> <matthew.revell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> ...
>>> I'll put my cards on the table and say that my preference is for
>>> closing the team-member hole and having a separate PPA agreement.
>>> Obviously that depends on an agreement system that can track more than
>>> just the one CoC.
>>>
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> Are Launchpad's own terms of use not sufficient?
>
> The PPA terms and the general LP terms probably are sufficient, as
> worded. I think we can do a better job of making them visible and of
> explicitly asking people to abide by the PPA terms.
>

Oh, I had thought that Launchpad had folded the PPA terms of use into
its main terms of use.

If LP is striving for ease of maintenance, having one thing that
people need to agree to in order to use the site is probably better
than having three such things.

jml


Follow ups

References