← Back to team overview

launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

Re: visibility vs. information_type for Products

 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12-09-18 12:36 PM, Curtis Hovey wrote:
> On 09/18/2012 12:31 PM, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>> I don't really understand how private teams work.  Is the idea
>> that they have AccessPolicies, and then anyone with the right 
>> AccessPolicyGrant can see them?  If so, it sounds like it would
>> be a good fit.
> 
> They do not have any form of access policy. But given that Swift
> and product strategy created teams that they wanted to become
> public, I think we do want to solve this case. OEM/HWE does not
> need it though.

Okay, I was confused by the accesspolicy.person column, but on IRC you
explained that's unused.

I think an AccessArtifactGrant might be the right approach.  If we
don't use access policies, then the PRIVATE/EMBARGOED distinction
affects display, but does not affect who can see the team.  (PUBLIC
means "all", PRIVATE/EMBARGOED means "only grantees".)

Aaron

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlBYqwEACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI3J6gCfZjQOKV3kbrE/+0GwjLtZ5+Di
qSUAn2j6982jWSwKFd+SNBZUoQYRYIUP
=z/mN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


References