On 9/21/07, Mario Limonciello <superm1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm not too sure I agree with this massive expiration on the bug > reports. Just because there was no activity for 60 days doesn't make > the bug invalid. Lots of people have very large queues, and won't be > getting to it for a while. The bugs still do exist and this is making > it appear as though they are insignificant or unnecessary. Note that the bugs have to be inactive for 60 days *and* in the Incomplete state. If we're just waiting for info from the reporter or something that leaves it incomplete then 60 days without activity seems reasonable. The issue I see with this change is that people (including myself) probably aren't using the Incomplete status properly. Perhaps we want to move a Incomplete to Confirmed if we want to keep it around but don't have enough info to get it to Triaged. LP devs, is this the correct bug flow? -Jordan -Jordan
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)