All the duplicates have also sent out a spam mail. Caroline On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 21:11 -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote: > On 9/21/07, Mario Limonciello <superm1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm not too sure I agree with this massive expiration on the bug > > reports. Just because there was no activity for 60 days doesn't make > > the bug invalid. Lots of people have very large queues, and won't be > > getting to it for a while. The bugs still do exist and this is making > > it appear as though they are insignificant or unnecessary. > > Note that the bugs have to be inactive for 60 days *and* in the > Incomplete state. If we're just waiting for info from the reporter or > something that leaves it incomplete then 60 days without activity > seems reasonable. > > The issue I see with this change is that people (including myself) > probably aren't using the Incomplete status properly. Perhaps we want > to move a Incomplete to Confirmed if we want to keep it around but > don't have enough info to get it to Triaged. LP devs, is this the > correct bug flow? > > -Jordan > > -Jordan >
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)