On Mon Aug 24 17:01:27 +0100 2009 Tom Haddon wrote: > I think it would be better for you to be using the non-edge APIs - this > would ensure your scripts don't get clobbered. Even if we fix the edge > rollouts to roll back any changes if one fails, there could still be > potential state inconsistencies during the edge rollout itself. I wasn't aware that there were non-edge APIs yet. That would certainly be great to have, as it would give an escape route. I think I would continue to use edge when there weren't long-running issues, partly to help beta test, and partly because if a code change causes an issue then if it lands on production it could be longer until a fix could arrive. Being able to switch for long running problems would be great, and I encounter enough short-term issues that I'm not too worried about inconsistencies during the rollout. Thanks, James
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)