2009/9/4 Vincent Ladeuil <v.ladeuil+lp@xxxxxxx>: >>>>>> "jml" == Jonathan Lange <jml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > jml> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Christian Robottom > jml> Reis<kiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:04:04AM +0800, John McCabe-Dansted wrote: > >>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Karl Fogel<karl.fogel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > With the 3.0 release coming up soon, we're beginning the 4.0 planning > >>> > process. To help with prioritization, we'd like to know your top 3 > >>> > wishes for Launchpad 4.0. Please follow up in this thread, and... > >>> > >>> 1) Make it easy to tell if a bug with the exact same summary has been > >>> proposed. If apport creates with summary "Title signal 5 in foo_bar", > >>> tell me whether a bug with the exact same summary has been reported. I > >>> am guessing that if the summaries differ then the bug is either > >>> different or that at least exhibits different symptoms which may > >>> assist in debugging. > >> > >> Ironically, Launchpad actually does have a feature like this; when you > >> +filebug you get pretty good duplicate matching, and the summary is > >> actually displayed. > >> > > jml> And wouldn't it be great to do this for already-filed bugs! There's actually a branch sitting on my hard drive right now that would make this super, super easy to implement as an asynchronous widgety area. Unfortunately it's fallen by the wayside due to the push to get the UI ready for 3.0, amongst other things. Maybe we can address this fairly early on the road to 4.0. -- Graham Binns | PGP Key: EC66FA7D
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)