On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 10:47 +1300, Robert Collins wrote: > >> The terms say this: > >> > >> "any content you upload to PPAs must be freely redistributable by > Canonical, > >> and released under a license permitting redistribution free of > charge." > >> > >> > Will this be sufficient to comply with the PPA ToU? > >> > >> Yes, I believe that fits the requirements of the PPA terms of use. > >> It'd be good to post a statement from the developer, or something > >> similar, in the PPA description. I think you did something similar > >> before. > > > > I think this is a mistake. I think not think the package meets the > > criteria defined in > http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines or > > http://opensource.org/docs/osd > > > > I must be able to get the source and be permitted to modify it. > > Not according to the PPA Terms of Use : perhaps they are wrong and > should be altered. But as they *stand*, no, thats not a requirement. I think there are some unstated issues at play here. The package in question contain NC items. I think this violates items 6 "Must not discriminate against persons, groups or against fields of endeavour" Can I upload this package to a project are a release file, or place it as an attachment to a bug? -- __Curtis C. Hovey_________ http://launchpad.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
This is the launchpad-users mailing list archive — see also the general help for Launchpad.net mailing lists.
(Formatted by MHonArc.)