linaro-project-management team mailing list archive

[Scott Bambrough <scott.bambrough@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 11:48 -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Alexander Sack <asac@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Scott Bambrough
> > <scott.bambrough@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 12:57 +0000, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> >>>  * linux-linaro-lt-fsl
> >>>  * linux-linaro-lt-samsung
> >>>  * linux-linaro-lt-ste
> >>>  * linux-linaro-lt-ti
> >>
> >> Please drop these until 11.07.
> >
> > Didn't we say we'd do tags for our "ubuntu" lt trees for this round?
> > AFAIK, most teams have a good kernel that we could tag put out as
> > components? at least ti should be tagged because thats the kernel we
> > use for our LEB.
> 
> As we discussed during LDS the LT would be responsible for providing
> the proper packaged kernel in their own PPAs, with help from John
> Rigby if needed.

This hasn't changed.  Though I hadn't planned on the LT providing
monthly updates to the kernel for Ubuntu, just for the milestones.  

IIRC, you are providing the hardware pack for the LEB.  That still the
case?

> If this is still not the case for the LTs, we should provide at least
> a valid tag and tarball so people could experiment it.

Alexander and I agreed Monday that the LT's would tag their tree
monthly, and platform would generate the tarballs from those tags.  The
LT's will not be generating tarballs for monthly releases.

> Andy, as we discussed at IRC, John will help you for 11.06, so the
> only thing you need to do is to tag both 38 (as you also included some
> other fixes) and 39 trees tomorrow. Once tagged John will jump on it,
> adding the packaging bits and making it available at a PPA, so we can
> generate the proper hwpacks for it.
> 
> We should at least get this going with TI LT as it's the only official
> LEB at the moment.

Agreed.

Scott

-- 
Scott Bambrough <scott.bambrough@xxxxxxxxxx>
Technical Director, Linaro Landing Teams