linaro-project-management team mailing list archive

[Ricardo Salveti <ricardo.salveti@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Christian Robottom Reis
<kiko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:57:40PM +0300, Ilias Biris wrote:
>> I am opening this to the TLs and project managers for feedback since
>> there was no opposing feedback from OPSCOM. I would like to have this
>> settled before Connect @ Hong Kong.
>>
>> The proposal is to remove the PLANNED state from our roadmap process,
>> and assume that when a card is ACCEPTED it already has a proposed
>> delivery cycle (fixVersion field value in JIRA). Doing that would
>> simplify our process.
>
> The main reason to call the status PLANNED at the time was to avoid
> indicating that the card was really fixed to the column/quarter it was
> set in. The idea was that PLANNED would transform into ACCEPTED when the
> quarter opened (and cards that were to be postponed would be).
>
> I agree that with the orthogonal quarter tracking in Jira this is now
> superseded, so +1 from me.

+1 for me as well, seems it's not entirely needed anymore.

Cheers,
-- 
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo