linaro-project-management team mailing list archive

[Ilias Biris <ilias.biris@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ok thanks to all who +1'd the proposal.

I have now a draft workflow where the planned state is removed. Also I
will manually update the total 7 cards which are in planned state now,
this means that the following cards will be reverted to ACCEPTED state,
since the PLANNED card state is going away.

http://cards.linaro.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=10116

They are all from Kernel WG, so here is one final call to Deepak or
Mounir to voice any concern.

Mounir/Deepak please voice any concerns/questions today. See the
previous message in the thread regarding the original proposal.

thanks,
Ilias


On 11/05/12 10:49, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Christian Robottom Reis
> <kiko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:57:40PM +0300, Ilias Biris wrote:
>>> I am opening this to the TLs and project managers for feedback since
>>> there was no opposing feedback from OPSCOM. I would like to have this
>>> settled before Connect @ Hong Kong.
>>>
>>> The proposal is to remove the PLANNED state from our roadmap process,
>>> and assume that when a card is ACCEPTED it already has a proposed
>>> delivery cycle (fixVersion field value in JIRA). Doing that would
>>> simplify our process.
>>
>> The main reason to call the status PLANNED at the time was to avoid
>> indicating that the card was really fixed to the column/quarter it was
>> set in. The idea was that PLANNED would transform into ACCEPTED when the
>> quarter opened (and cards that were to be postponed would be).
>>
>> I agree that with the orthogonal quarter tracking in Jira this is now
>> superseded, so +1 from me.
> 
> +1 for me as well, seems it's not entirely needed anymore.
> 
> Cheers,


-- 
Ilias Biris ilias.biris@xxxxxxxxxx
Project Manager, Linaro
M: +358504839608, IRC: ibiris Skype: ilias_biris
Linaro.org│ Open source software for ARM SoCs