← Back to team overview

linaro-project-management team mailing list archive

Re: Explicit resourcing for cards, was Re: Proposal to improve the roadmap process - PLANNED state

 

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
<kiko@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Piggy-backing on Ilias' thread on process changes, I wanted to bring up
> an idea I've had for cards.
>
> Could we make it a pre-requisite for submitting a card for allocation to
> a quarter that it have the names of the engineers involved in the work?
>
This year Linaro is moving to 3 Connects instead of 4.   Do we know when
the Connect after Hong Kong will be?
In another words, how many months do we have to plan for the next quarter?

In other words, a card would also have the team working on it identified
> as early as being allocated to a quarter, which would promote better
> visibility for the TSC as to which assignees (from which companies in
> particular) are working on what tasks, and also, the general size of the
> work.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP
> Brazil (GMT-3) | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | [+1] 612 216 4935
> Linaro.org: Open Source Software for ARM SoCs
>



-- 
Mounir Bsaibes
Project Manager

Follow Linaro.org:
facebook.com/pages/Linaro/155974581091106
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg
http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog>

Follow ups

References