← Back to team overview

linaro-project-management team mailing list archive

Re: Explicit resourcing for cards, was Re: Proposal to improve the roadmap process - PLANNED state

 

I'm ok with it.

It does seem to duplicate some information that is already contained
in the blueprints. (who is working on)  For my 2Q cards I already
included effort estimates.

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
<kiko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Piggy-backing on Ilias' thread on process changes, I wanted to bring up
> an idea I've had for cards.
>
> Could we make it a pre-requisite for submitting a card for allocation to
> a quarter that it have the names of the engineers involved in the work?
> In other words, a card would also have the team working on it identified
> as early as being allocated to a quarter, which would promote better
> visibility for the TSC as to which assignees (from which companies in
> particular) are working on what tasks, and also, the general size of the
> work.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP
> Brazil (GMT-3) | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | [+1] 612 216 4935
> Linaro.org: Open Source Software for ARM SoCs

-- 
Regards,
Tom

"Where's the kaboom!? There was supposed to be an earth-shattering
kaboom!" Marvin Martian
Multimedia Tech Lead | Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
w) tom.gall att linaro.org
w) tom_gall att vnet.ibm.com
h) tom_gall att mac.com


References