lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Erick Brunzell <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 05/23/2013 02:10 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
> Lance your right on the 2 three-gaps in the schedule. The schedule was
> really hard to keep the 2 week going with the odd scheduling of the
> alpha's and freeze, etc. This was supposed to be changed by the
> release team, but until/if it does I think this should meet our needs
> nicely. In addition, we're tossing around the idea of tracking
> important packages all cycle, so the milestones on these weeks would
> never be closed anyway :-) See the thread on the ubuntu-quality
> mailing list.
>
> Nicholas

Thanks Nicholas. That should be enough info for the team to make a decision.

Lance