lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

It was you guys who spotted the 'odd' time scale on one of the gaps. As
they are all voluntary, I have suggested that we do do not fret about A2,
there is not too much stuff due between A1 and A2. Should Julien need to
call in testing for A2 he can do. The request for the alphas and betas are
asked of each flavour about 1 week before they happen.

Regards,

Phill.

On 12 June 2013 02:04, Erick Brunzell <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  On 06/11/2013 04:47 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
>
> Hi Julien,
>
>  From reading through the concerns of 'over testing', the schedule[1]
> shows alpha 3 following on two weeks after alpha 2. If we drop alpha 2 we
> get a more 'sane' testing schedule:
>
>  June 20th Alpha1
> August 1st  Alpha3
> August 29th Beta1
> September 26th Final Beta
> October 10th Release Candidate
>
>  Is this okay with you?
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Philll.
>  1. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseSchedule
> --
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
>
>  I'm cool with whatever Julien decides. BTW I was the one that pointed out
> the odd scheduling:
>
> https://lists.launchpad.net/lubuntu-qa/msg02450.html
>
> And I followed up with Nicholas:
>
> https://lists.launchpad.net/lubuntu-qa/msg02511.html
>
> But I rather imagine that our own dev schedule is more important than my
> personal desires.
>
> It might seem odd to some "outsiders" to have no Alpha 2 but then have an
> Alpha 3 :^(
>
> Ultimately I want to leave this decision up to Julien ;^)
>
> I'll live with his decision regardless.
>
> Lance
>



-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw