lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
that teach me not to read the full email!

All of the alphas and betas are 'opt in'. A flavour could start at Release
Canditate if they wanted. Julien is quite entitled to say that he does not
want to subscribe to any alpha / beta release. He is the boss and it would
not seem 'odd' to outsiders. they're too busy working out their own
schedules. That is why the schedule[1] states that it is "Opt In".

Regards,

Phill.
1. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseSchedule

On 12 June 2013 02:04, Erick Brunzell <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  On 06/11/2013 04:47 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
>
> Hi Julien,
>
>  From reading through the concerns of 'over testing', the schedule[1]
> shows alpha 3 following on two weeks after alpha 2. If we drop alpha 2 we
> get a more 'sane' testing schedule:
>
>  June 20th Alpha1
> August 1st  Alpha3
> August 29th Beta1
> September 26th Final Beta
> October 10th Release Candidate
>
>  Is this okay with you?
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Philll.
>  1. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseSchedule
> --
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
>
>  I'm cool with whatever Julien decides. BTW I was the one that pointed out
> the odd scheduling:
>
> https://lists.launchpad.net/lubuntu-qa/msg02450.html
>
> And I followed up with Nicholas:
>
> https://lists.launchpad.net/lubuntu-qa/msg02511.html
>
> But I rather imagine that our own dev schedule is more important than my
> personal desires.
>
> It might seem odd to some "outsiders" to have no Alpha 2 but then have an
> Alpha 3 :^(
>
> Ultimately I want to leave this decision up to Julien ;^)
>
> I'll live with his decision regardless.
>
> Lance
>



-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw