lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

["Ali Linx (amjjawad)" <amjjawad@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Without explaining why we should do that, it is hard to tell whether
yes or no :)

What makes it "potentially dangerous" application?

Thank you!

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Erick Brunzell <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've always wondered why we, or any OS, would include a potentially
> dangerous app in the "Accessories" column of a menu. IMHO Red Hats
> 'gnome-disk-utility' only adds risk so why do we even include it as a
> default app?
>
> In many ways it's comparable to Gparted which Ubuntu long ago decided to
> provide only on the live image so it would be available for installation
> purposes. BTW I think Gparted is much easier for even a noob to use.
>
> So I just wanted us to think about possibly dropping
> 'gnome-disk-utility' from "depends" and/or "recommends". It's not an
> earthshaking thing .............. just a thought.
>
> Lance
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
> Post to     : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



--
"All of us are smarter than any one of us."

Best Regards,
amjjawad
Start Ubuntu

Test Machine: ASUS F3F Laptop - Intel Core Duo T2350 @ 1.86GHz with 489MB RAM