lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive
-
lubuntu-qa team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03555
Re: KVM, qemu, and virt-manager versus VirtualBox
Hi,
KVM install also went flawlessly (Remember to switch to VMVGA graphics when
installing [1]). Boots fine, Ffox can see the world, shuts down fine and
reboots fine.
Regards,
Phill.
1. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58574
On 16 September 2013 23:12, Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nio,
>
> sorry, it will be tomorrow before I have a play with KVM and the ISO...
> Been building a new VM tonight, which using the new instructions for remote
> install has been 'stressful' (as they miss out the bit of how to choose
> which ISO you want to use when you have 10's of the little critters on your
> server).
>
> Regards,
>
> Phill.
>
> Phill.
>
>
> On 16 September 2013 17:01, Nio Wiklund <nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Good that the alternate iso of Lubuntu Saucy 64-bit works well in VBox :-)
>>
>> Nio
>>
>> On 2013-09-16 17:54, Phill Whiteside wrote:
>> > Sorry,
>> >
>> > that should read "I do NOT have the extras package for Vbox"
>> >
>> > Phill.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 16 September 2013 16:54, Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx
>> > <mailto:PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Lubuntu Alternate AMD64 dated 15th Sept installed successfully into
>> > Virtual Box. Allocated 512MB RAM and 10GB of Disk Space.
>> >
>> > Host machine is running fully updated saucy and Vbox is version
>> > 4.2.16 I do have the extras package installed for VBox.
>> >
>> > The VM boots fine, I can access Firefox and the internet and it also
>> > closes down with no issues of hanging / slow speed etc.
>> >
>> > Will run a KVM install later this evening with the same iso, RAM and
>> > Disk Space allocations.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Phill.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 16 September 2013 12:05, Nio Wiklund <nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx
>> > <mailto:nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2013-09-16 10:56, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>> > > On 2013-09-16 10:40, Jörn Schönyan wrote:
>> > >> I had Kubuntu Saucy installed on my machine, a normal install
>> > without
>> > >> virtualization. After updating, LightDM failed at boot.
>> Endless
>> > >> Plymouth-screen. When I pressed Escape, I could read the boot
>> > messages
>> > >> which stated that LightDM failed.
>> > >>
>> > >> I reported that bug, but noone else seems to have the
>> problem. My
>> > >> temporary workaround was logging into tty1 and startx.
>> > >>
>> > >> Am Montag, 16. September 2013, 10:19:59 schrieben Sie:
>> > >>> Joern,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I have the installed system in the vbox now. I can retry
>> > installing
>> > >>> again. So please describe exactly what you want, and at what
>> > stage!
>> > >>
>> > > I installed the same Lubuntu saucy daily desktop amd64 system
>> > into my
>> > > Toshiba in CSM mode
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://www.toshiba.se/laptops/satellite-pro/c850/satellite-pro-c850-19w/
>> > >
>> > > It worked better than vbox. It hangs in a different way. The
>> > screen with
>> > > the message is closed, the graphical screen is shut down and
>> > it hangs at
>> > > the text screen with one single message line:
>> > >
>> > > * Asking all remaining processes to terminate... [OK]
>> > >
>> > > And when I press Enter, it will reboot. So in the Toshiba, it
>> > seems to
>> > > be the old bug, that there is no message to remove the boot
>> > media and
>> > > press Enter, bug 966480.
>> > >
>> > > The installation was into a CSM system (not UEFI).
>> > >
>> > > The installed system boots and runs without any problem (that
>> > I have
>> > > discovered yet).
>> > >
>> > > Best regards
>> > > Nio
>> > >
>> >
>> > 1. I have installed a virtual machine using KVM, qemu, and
>> > virt-manager
>> > according to a tip from Phill to use this wiki page
>> >
>> > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/KVM/VirtManager
>> >
>> > It is installed in the Lubuntu 64-bit saucy-daily system in my
>> > Toshiba
>> > (describe above).
>> >
>> > The KVM system can install Lubuntu 64-bit saucy-daily, and the
>> > installed
>> > system works :-)
>> >
>> > It is fast (and does not hang at the reboot button like the VBox
>> > system
>> > does in my old Asus). It behaves very similar to installing and
>> > running
>> > in a real system (only the old bug 966480).
>> >
>> > -o-
>> >
>> > 2. I don't know, but I suspect that the desktop installer for
>> > the 64-bit
>> > systems needs more RAM than the corresponding installer for
>> 32-bits.
>> > Could it be that 1.25 GB is not enough, so that the installer
>> hangs
>> > because of low RAM? And this is what causes VBox to fail? (I
>> > have only 2
>> > GB in that old Asus host, a it might be hard to give more than
>> > 1.25 GB
>> > to the guest (it is already complaining about it). Or could it
>> > be a bug
>> > specifically for VBox?
>> >
>> > Can someone test with VBox and various amounts of RAM allocated,
>> > also
>> > more than 1.25GB?
>> >
>> > Best regards
>> > Nio
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
--
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
References
-
Lubuntu 13.10 beta
From: Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen, 2013-09-15
-
Re: Lubuntu 13.10 beta
From: Nio Wiklund, 2013-09-15
-
Re: Lubuntu 13.10 beta
From: Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen, 2013-09-15
-
Re: Lubuntu 13.10 beta
From: Nio Wiklund, 2013-09-15
-
Re: Lubuntu 13.10 beta
From: Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen, 2013-09-15
-
Re: Lubuntu 13.10 beta
From: Nio Wiklund, 2013-09-15
-
Re: Lubuntu 13.10 beta
From: Nio Wiklund, 2013-09-15
-
Re: Lubuntu 13.10 beta
From: Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen, 2013-09-15
-
Re: Lubuntu 13.10 beta
From: Nio Wiklund, 2013-09-16
-
Re: Lubuntu 13.10 beta
From: Joern, 2013-09-16
-
Re: Lubuntu 13.10 beta
From: Nio Wiklund, 2013-09-16
-
Re: Lubuntu 13.10 beta
From: Jörn Schönyan, 2013-09-16
-
Re: Lubuntu 13.10 beta
From: Nio Wiklund, 2013-09-16
-
KVM, qemu, and virt-manager versus VirtualBox
From: Nio Wiklund, 2013-09-16
-
Re: KVM, qemu, and virt-manager versus VirtualBox
From: Phill Whiteside, 2013-09-16
-
Re: KVM, qemu, and virt-manager versus VirtualBox
From: Phill Whiteside, 2013-09-16
-
Re: KVM, qemu, and virt-manager versus VirtualBox
From: Nio Wiklund, 2013-09-16
-
Re: KVM, qemu, and virt-manager versus VirtualBox
From: Phill Whiteside, 2013-09-16