lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Jackson Doak <noskcaj@xxxxxxxxxx>]

first, please stop saying that, OMGubuntu exists purely to make those
speculations.
second, ubuntu-gnome's call has helped, but it also got a guy who said we
should just merge into fedora.
third, if we drop alternate, most people with really old PCs (lead by
phill), will be angry
fourth, we still need someone who's release manager to approve our ISOs for
release, since the ubuntu guys won't.


On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Erick Brunzell <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  On 12/26/2013 07:22 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
>
> Hi Good people,
>
>  as you will have seen, there was no alpha 1 test for lubuntu. There will
> be no alpha 2 etc. until you good people actually nominate some one to take
> the role on.
>
>  It's quite simple.... You decide on who will be a release manager and
> then the boss works out as to if they can actually fulfil the role.
>
>  So, instead of expecting someone else to do things... Well, go advertise
> the job vacancy :)
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Phill.
>
>  --
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
>
>  What happens if we just adopt Ubuntu's dev cycle w/o opting in to the
> other testing cycles?
>
> This really blows my mind, somehow we met the minimum requirements to
> become an official flavor but now we're stuck:^(
>
> Maybe it's time to drop the alternate images?
>
> I see Ali's comments have also gotten Ubuntu GNOME in hot water at
> Phoronix so I wonder if these recruitment efforts are not causing more
> trouble than relief???
>
> You can be sure that other websites will translate this into the demise of
> Lubuntu - whether true or not!
>
> Lance
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
> Post to     : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>