Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Hi Walter, After the arm-ac100 people left us high and dry, I doubt there will be much enthusiasm to go and get burned again. Regards, Phill. On 11 November 2014 18:05, Walter Lapchynski <wxl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Supporting ARM would be awesome, but ARM isn't ARM. There is the RaspPi, > > which we can't support because it is ARMv6 - Ubuntu only builds for ARMv7 > > and better. > > I did mean v7 FWIW. Except for the Pi, most ARM boards out there > > > Conclusion: supporting ARM means in fact: support a small range of > devices. > > I did some talking at #ubuntu-arm. It appears that the reason the port > exists is for two reasons: > 1. supporting Touch (a small range of devices) > 2. ARM servers > > Beyond that, like you said, there's a lot of differences when it comes > to booting and drivers. That being said, I retract my original query. > We should not be supporting this. We'd have better luck supporting PPC > (oh wait, we do). I'll make a blog post or something about it later > once I get it going. > > Sorry for getting everyone excited. :) > > -- > @wxl > Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA > Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact > Ubuntu Oregon LoCo Team Leader > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > Post to : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |