lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Nio Wiklund <nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Den 2015-03-04 14:38, Lars Noodén skrev:
> On 04.03.2015 14:50, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>> Hi Walter, Lars, Phill and all other Lubuntu users
>>
>> I think we have a working alternative, that should be rather easy to
>> implement for the Alternate Install (Encryption) test-cases (for the
>> i386 as well as the amd64 iso files).
>>
>> @ Walter and Lars: Can we agree to modify the (alternate) test-cases?
>>
>> @ Lars: ... and when agreed, will you edit the alternate test-cases?
>>
>> @ Walter and Lars: The next step will be to design corresponding
>> test-cases for the Lubuntu desktop iso files.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I can try modifying the Alternate encryption case, if someone can remind
> me of the URL to the right guide to do that, when the time comes.  The
> hard part is not the HTML but dealing with bazaar and then following the
> right procedure for a pull.  Would that be for 15.04 or for 15.10?
> 
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/files/head:/testcases/image/
> 
> For 16.04, it would be best if the installers handled encryption
> properly so that workarounds like dropping to the shell are not needed
> for full disk encryption.
> 
>> ...
>> @ everybody:
>>
>> Skipping 'encrypted home inside encrypted disk with LVM' makes things
>> much easier to get working. ...
> 
> Encrypted home is probably important if there are multiple users or one
> user with multiple roles on the machine.  For the full hard disk
> encryption I see a main use-case as being work laptops that travel and
> thus at risk of being lost or stolen.
> 
> Regards,
> /Lars
> 

Hi Lars,

1. I hope we can agree very soon about the alternate encryption
test-cases, and do it for 15.04, but I can fully understand, that Walter
or some other important persons may want to wait and think twice before
changing these test-cases.

2. What I suggested today does not imply any dropping to a shell.
Without encrypted home the alternate test-cases will be smooth. But I'm
waiting for someone (you, Lars?) to verify my test results.

3. I agree that 'Encrypted home' is important if there are multiple
users or one user with multiple roles on the machine. But must it be
combined with encrypted disk and LVM?

4. I think creating the corresponding test-cases for the desktop
installer needs more time, but modifying the alternate test-cases need
not wait for the desktop ones to be ready for publishing.

Best regards
Nio