maas-devel team mailing list archive
-
maas-devel team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00043
Re: Node states
-
To:
maas-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Julian Edwards <julian.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:54:16 +0000
-
In-reply-to:
<CAKiYkZ+0jgZMcnEhV0TJvpKUHvqjZQ7=t8_dEzJ43YLG-pVkQA@mail.gmail.com>
-
Organization:
Canonical Ltd
-
User-agent:
KMail/4.8.0 (Linux/3.2.0-12-generic; KDE/4.8.0; x86_64; ; )
On Friday 03 February 2012 14:54:26 Matthew Revell wrote:
> The "Bad" states haven't really come up in conversation but they seem
> to me to be necessary.
I agree, I think BAD should be exapanded to MISSING and FAILED_TESTS though.
> There is some fuzziness around "Retired": is a retired node one which
> has been taken out of action manually, for whatever reasons, or is it
> a node that was previously declared and has been torn down? From our
> discussions in Budapest, the first of these makes most sense to me.
> Also, I believe a deployed node simply becomes declared once it has
> been torn down.
>
> Thanks in advance for your comments.
Retired is a manual action where a machine is manually removed from use. So
your assumption is correct there.
Follow ups
References