maas-devel team mailing list archive
-
maas-devel team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00045
Re: Node states
On 3 February 2012 15:54, Julian Edwards <julian.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday 03 February 2012 14:54:26 Matthew Revell wrote:
>> The "Bad" states haven't really come up in conversation but they seem
>> to me to be necessary.
>
> I agree, I think BAD should be exapanded to MISSING and FAILED_TESTS though.
I can't think of another bad state that MaaS would know about, so
MISSING (or AWOL, if you prefer) and FAILED_TESTS cover the bad states
MaaS will know about.
That gives us:
* DECLARED: MaaS is aware of the node and has assigned it a system
ID, but has done nothing else to it.
* COMMISSIONING: testing and other commissioning steps are taking place.
* FAILED_TESTS: smoke or burn-in testing has a found a problem.
* MISSING: the MaaS can't contact the node.
* READY: the node is in the general pool ready to be deployed.
* RESERVED: the node is ready for named deployment.
* ALLOCATED: the node is powering a service from a charm or is ready
for use with a fresh Ubuntu install.
* RETIRED: The node has been removed from service manually until the
MaaS owner overrides the retirement.
--
Matthew Revell
Launchpad Product Manager
Canonical
https://launchpad.net/~matthew.revell
References